Loading...
Title : The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
link : The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
Here's a recent paper in PNAS, |
An experimental investigation of preference misrepresentation in the residency match
Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
https://ift.tt/2Q2HER4
"The development and deployment of matching procedures that incentivize truthful preference reporting is considered one of the major successes of market design research. In this study, we test the degree to which these procedures succeed in eliminating preference misrepresentation. We administered an online experiment to 1,714 medical students immediately after their participation in the medical residency match—a leading field application of strategy-proof market design. When placed in an analogous, incentivized matching task, we find that 23% of participants misrepresent their preferences. We explore the factors that predict preference misrepresentation, including cognitive ability, strategic positioning, overconfidence, expectations, advice, and trust. We discuss the implications of this behavior for the design of allocation mechanisms and the social welfare in markets that use them
An experimental investigation of preference misrepresentation in the residency match
Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
https://ift.tt/2Q2HER4
"The development and deployment of matching procedures that incentivize truthful preference reporting is considered one of the major successes of market design research. In this study, we test the degree to which these procedures succeed in eliminating preference misrepresentation. We administered an online experiment to 1,714 medical students immediately after their participation in the medical residency match—a leading field application of strategy-proof market design. When placed in an analogous, incentivized matching task, we find that 23% of participants misrepresent their preferences. We explore the factors that predict preference misrepresentation, including cognitive ability, strategic positioning, overconfidence, expectations, advice, and trust. We discuss the implications of this behavior for the design of allocation mechanisms and the social welfare in markets that use them
Thus Article The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek
that is all articles The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article post.
You now read the article The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek with the link address https://latestjobsus.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-resident-match-can-be-confusing-in.html
0 Response to "The resident match can be confusing, in PNAS by Alex Rees-Jones and Samuel Skowronek"
Post a Comment